Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elana Mitchell's avatar

The insistence on inserting AI into everything really screams how much it's a solution in search of a problem.

I was helping to host a department meeting yesterday where we were showcasing the work each team had completed since the last catch up and we had a Lunar New Year theme. I was in charge of useless trivia and providing a quiz to keep people amused between presentations, so I googled my research. My colleague "helped" by getting our internal GPT to produce the quiz questions. Which was fine, but it was also something that took me 15 seconds in a search engine. I'm genuinely at a loss as to how that "adds value", which is ironic considering my team is using machine learning and AI to crunch data to enhance human decision making, and our endless mantra is "yeah that's cool, but is it going to add value to X?"

Sigh. Adding the mandatory "get off my lawn" to wrap up this rant.

Expand full comment
Ross Cameron's avatar

It’s almost amusing that there’s an industry in writing guides to delete, disable and/or gimp the latest and greatest in software - to try and stop or minimise the data harvesting via software and capabilities we don’t want or need.

Bit like Copilot, Cortana, etc.

We need the core capabilities, just not the so-called bells and whistles / bloatware that the big companies try to ram down our throats with it. Opt in if you want, just don’t make it opt out or not optional.

It worked really well when Apple commissioned and forced U2’s Songs of Innocence via iTunes?

MS and Rover / Clippy have a lot to answer for.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts